Sometimes an inventor may wonder if he/she is safe to disclose his invention to a potential licensee if he has the licensee sign a confidentiality agreement. Or perhaps an inventor has a patent application filed, and wonders if he should also have a potential licensee sign a confidentiality agreement just to be extra safe. Here is my view on the value of both forms of protection.
Many companies view independent
inventors as a total waste of their time, a pain in the butt, and a potential
lawsuit. They often have policies that they won’t sign confidentiality
agreements, and really don’t want to see an inventor’s invention. The danger
for them is that people in their own organization may be working on the same
problem, and they could view the inventor’s stuff, reject it, then a year later
come out with the product they have been working on in their lab. The inventor
could then sue them for breach of contract. With that possibility in mind they
usually won’t even look at an invention unless it is patent pending. If it is
patent pending, then the invention is defined, so then their decision becomes 1)
whether their in-house product is an infringement of the claims of the patent,
and 2) can they prove they conceived of it first.
Their policy may be to never sign
confidentiality agreements, to protect themselves from lawsuits by whacko
inventors.
From the inventors point of view, if the potential licensee signs
a confidentiality agreement and then breaches it, he can sue them for breach of
contract. That’s not too practical for most inventors, and the licensee knows it. So its not much of a threat.
If the inventor has a patent pending and the licensee rips him off the inventor can proceed to get the patent issued, and sue them for patent
infringement. As damages he can get triple damages if he can prove that the
infringement is willful. Patent damages start to accrue from the date that the
application is published 18 months after it is filed, and he can ask for
expedited prosecution if infringement is involved. The inventor could also get an
injunction against the licensee ever selling the product. The inventor could also license the patent
rights to the licensee's biggest competitor, or five of their competitors, who could
afford to chase them through the courts and give them a spanking. Once the patent infringement case was won, the infringer would pay triple damages if the infringement was willful, have
to quit selling the invention, and their investment in marketing is lost, but
they will have created a need in the industry for the product which will
translate to lots more sales of the product to the inventor or his licensee.
It's not likely that this sequence
will happen, because the potential licensee will be able to see where things are going, and its
just a lot better business to license the patent rights, and pay the inventor
some money, and then for them to be able to keep their competitors out of that market
if it’s a good idea.
So if the inventor is patent pending the consequences of ripping him off are greater than if a confidentiality agreement is breached. By being patent pending going into the
meeting, the inventor conveys that he is not a dummy, he has some legal advice,
and is approaching this in a business-like manner.
It would not hurt to have a
confidentiality agreement as well, but I don’t think the inventor is likely to get it signed, and it doesn't buys him that much
leverage anyway.
Recent Comments